# Multi-Tenant Plan — JQC > **Audience:** AI assistants and developers extending JQC into a multi-tenant SaaS. > **Companion to:** `CLAUDE.md` (single-tenant architecture reference). > **Status:** Planning. No code written yet. Existing single-tenant deploy stays live and untouched until cutover. --- ## 1. Decisions (locked) | Decision | Choice | |---|---| | Isolation model | **Shared codebase + database-per-tenant** (one deploy, dynamic Host routing). NOT fork-per-tenant. | | "Managed by tenant" | Tenant-admin self-serves branding / users / settings / in-plan feature toggles. No per-tenant code edits. | | Plan-tier axes | (1) user quota, (2) facility quota, (3) inspections/month quota, (4) issues/month quota, (5) feature gates (mobile API, scheduled reports, …), (6) branding/white-label, (7) custom-domain vs subdomain-only. | | Existing LT deploy | Migrated in as **tenant-zero** — register existing live DB in place, no data move (§8). | | Quota-exceed behavior | **Soft warn** — allow submit, flag for upgrade. Never reject. | | Tenant DB credentials | **Per-tenant MySQL user + password**. Provisioning creates the user/grants; creds encrypted at rest in control DB. | Terminology: **control plane** = manages tenants (registry, plans, provisioning). **data plane** = serves tenant traffic (the existing Flask app, now tenant-aware). --- ## 2. Why this model - **DB-per-tenant** → true data isolation; satisfies "separate database". Each tenant = own MySQL database, e.g. `jqc_`. - **Shared code** → one codebase to patch. As a solo maintainer, N forks would mean N bug-fix deploys. Avoided. - App already uses the **application-factory pattern** (`create_app`) and **relative `/api/v1` paths** — both ideal for adding Host-based tenant routing with minimal churn. - Migrations already use `INFORMATION_SCHEMA` existence checks (CLAUDE.md Rule 14) → safe to re-run across every tenant DB unchanged. --- ## 3. Control-plane database (new, separate schema) Lives in its own MySQL database (e.g. `jqc_control`), its own Alembic env (chain prefix `control{N}_…`), never routed by tenant middleware. ``` plans id, code (slug: free/starter/pro/enterprise), name, active, max_users INT NULL, -- NULL = unlimited max_facilities INT NULL, max_inspections_month INT NULL, max_issues_month INT NULL, allow_custom_domain BOOL, allow_mobile_api BOOL, allow_scheduled_reports BOOL, allow_branding BOOL, -- white-label price_cents INT NULL, -- future billing billing_period VARCHAR(16) NULL plan_features -- optional EAV escape hatch for future boolean flags id, plan_id (FK), feature_key, enabled BOOL tenants id, slug (subdomain label, UNIQUE), name, plan_id (FK), status ENUM(provisioning, active, suspended, deleted), db_host, db_port, db_name, db_user, db_password_enc, -- creds encrypted at rest alembic_head VARCHAR(64), -- last tenant-schema rev applied created_at, suspended_at, notes tenant_domains id, tenant_id (FK), domain (UNIQUE), kind ENUM(subdomain, custom), is_primary BOOL, verified BOOL, verification_token, tls_status ENUM(pending, active, failed), created_at superadmins -- cross-tenant accounts, control-plane only id, username, email, password_hash, active, created_at provisioning_jobs id, tenant_id (FK), action ENUM(create_db, migrate, seed, suspend, delete), status ENUM(queued, running, ok, failed), log TEXT, created_at, finished_at tenant_audit -- superadmin actions (separate from per-tenant log_action) id, superadmin_id, action, tenant_id, details, ip_address, created_at ``` Submission quotas (inspections/issues per month) are enforced by **live-counting current-period rows in the tenant DB** at submit time (cheap with an index on the date column). No separate counter table required; always accurate. A cached `usage_counters` table is an optional later optimization if submit-path counts ever show up in profiling. --- ## 4. Tenant resolution + DB routing (the core mechanism) **Resolution** (`before_request`): `host = request.host.split(':')[0]` → look up `tenant_domains.domain == host` where `verified AND tenant.status='active'` → load `tenant` + `plan` into `g`. Unknown/unverified/suspended host → branded error/landing page (no tenant DB touched). **Routing without rewriting every `db.session` call** — use a routing Session so the entire existing codebase keeps using `db.session` unchanged (preserves Change-Philosophy Rules 5/7): ```python # app/tenancy/routing.py from sqlalchemy.orm import Session from flask import g class RoutingSession(Session): def get_bind(self, mapper=None, clause=None, **kw): # Tenant models (app.db.Model) bind to the per-request tenant engine. # The control plane is a SEPARATE Base/engine/session (control/base.py), # so it never passes through this session — no special-casing needed here. return getattr(g, 'tenant_engine', None) or _default_engine ``` > **MT-0 refinement (implemented):** the control plane uses its own > `ControlBase` + engine + session (`control/base.py`), **not** `db.Model` with > a `__control_plane__` flag. Stronger isolation, zero metadata mixing with the > tenant schema, and the control package imports nothing from `app/`. The > `RoutingSession` (MT-1) therefore only handles tenant models. ```python # app/__init__.py (one-line change to the existing db init) db = SQLAlchemy(session_options={'class_': RoutingSession}) ``` ```python # before_request g.tenant_engine = _engine_cache.get_or_create(tenant) # create_engine(tenant.db_uri) ``` - `_engine_cache`: `dict[tenant_id -> Engine]`, lazily built. Use small pools + `pool_recycle`; switch to `NullPool` if tenant count grows large (connection-count = Σ tenant pools). Documented scaling lever. - The **control plane is a separate Base/engine/session** (`control/base.py`); it never routes through `RoutingSession`. See §3 MT-0 refinement. - **Net code change to existing models/routes: zero.** They keep importing `from app import db` and calling `db.session`. --- ## 5. Migrations Two independent Alembic chains: 1. **Tenant schema** — the existing chain (current HEAD on disk: **`phase27_score_alerts`**; note `CLAUDE.md` text says phase23 — stale). Runs per-tenant DB. New tenant features continue this chain as `phase28_…`, `phase29_…` per existing naming + `down_revision` → current HEAD rule. 2. **Control schema** — new env, chain `control{N}_…`, runs once against `jqc_control`. CLI added: `flask tenant db upgrade --tenant ` loops tenants, sets `sqlalchemy.url` to each tenant URI, runs `command.upgrade(cfg, 'head')`, writes resulting head back to `tenants.alembic_head`. All existing migrations are re-run-safe (Rule 14), so this is idempotent across the fleet. Deploy ordering rule carries over (CLAUDE.md Rule 23): run tenant migrations **before** shipping app code that references new columns. --- ## 6. Plan-tier matrix (starting point — tune in §9) | Axis | Free | Starter | Pro | Enterprise | |---|---|---|---|---| | Max users | 3 | 15 | 50 | unlimited | | Max facilities | 2 | 10 | 50 | unlimited | | Inspections / month | 50 | 500 | 5 000 | unlimited | | Issues / month | 50 | 500 | 5 000 | unlimited | | Mobile API (iPad app) | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | | Scheduled reports | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | | Branding / white-label | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | | Custom domain | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ | | Subdomain (`*.jqc.app`) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | Enforcement: `@feature_required('mobile_api')` reads `g.tenant.plan` and **blocks** disabled features. Quota checks (`@quota_check('inspections')`) are **soft** — over-limit submits still succeed but the response/UI flags an upgrade prompt and the event is recorded; submits are never rejected. **Feature + quota checks must live in BOTH web routes and `/api/v1` endpoints** — the iPad submits via API, so a web-only check is bypassable (mirrors existing dual-enforcement Rules 39/56/57). --- ## 7. Phased roadmap Each phase additive; existing tenant-zero traffic keeps working throughout. **MT-0 — Control-plane scaffold. ✅ DONE.** Self-contained `control/` package at repo root: own `ControlBase` + engine + session, own Alembic chain (`control0001_init`), 7 models, Fernet-encrypted tenant creds, idempotent plan seeder, operator CLI. Zero imports into `app/` — existing app untouched. **MT-1 — Tenant resolution + routing. ✅ DONE.** `app/tenancy/` package: `routing.py` (`RoutingSession` subclassing the Flask-SQLAlchemy session), `resolver.py` (Host→tenant via control plane, lazy import), `engine_cache.py` (per-tenant engines), `context.py` (`TenantContext`), `middleware.py` (`init_tenancy` before_request hook + branded unknown-host 404). Edits: `db` init in `app/__init__.py` (+`init_tenancy(app)` call) and `MULTI_TENANT_ENABLED` + pool flags in `config.py`. Gated behind `MULTI_TENANT_ENABLED` (default False) — fully inert until flipped. **MT-2 — Per-tenant migration runner. ✅ DONE (with blocker found).** Standalone `migrations_tenant/env.py` (reads URL from config, reuses `migrations/versions` via `version_locations`, no Flask) + `control/tenant_migrate.py` (`upgrade_tenant()`, `current_revision()`, `chain_head()`, CLI: `python -m control.tenant_migrate upgrade|current|heads --tenant `). Records `tenants.alembic_head` + a `ProvisioningJob('migrate')` per run. Existing `migrations/env.py` untouched (normal `flask db` still works). > **⚠ Blocker found by MT-2:** the live `migrations/versions` chain has **no base** — `phase1_projects_roles.down_revision = '0003_add_user_active'`, which is absent, and no revision has `down_revision = None`. Alembic cannot build the revision map, so `upgrade head` fails against any DB (even a no-op on an up-to-date one). The pre-`phase1` baseline migrations must be restored (or a guarded squashed baseline created) before MT-2 can run against real MySQL DBs and before MT-3 can provision fresh tenants. **MT-3 — Provisioning service.** Create DB → create **per-tenant MySQL user + password** + grant scoped to that DB only → upgrade to head → seed first tenant-admin → invite email. Creds encrypted into the `tenants` row. Idempotent, `provisioning_jobs`-logged. **MT-4 — Superadmin control panel.** Tenant CRUD, plan assign, suspend/resume, domain mgmt, migration status, impersonation (scoped login into a tenant for support). At `admin.jqc.app`, separate blueprint, superadmin-gated. **MT-5 — Plans + quota/feature gating.** `@feature_required`, `@quota_check`; new cross-tenant `superadmin` (control plane). Existing tenant `admin` = top role within a tenant (unchanged ENUM). **MT-6 — Custom domain + TLS.** Wildcard cert for `*.jqc.app`; Caddy on-demand TLS in front for arbitrary custom domains. Domain-verification flow (TXT/CNAME) before activation. **MT-7 — Tenant self-service.** Tenant-admin: branding (logo/name/colors), domain request, plan view, in-plan feature toggles. User mgmt auto tenant-scoped by routing. **MT-8 — Billing (future).** Stripe per-plan; lifecycle (trial/suspend/dunning). Flag-gated. **MT-9 — iOS multi-tenant.** Replace hardcoded `ServerOption` enum (`Utils/Constants.swift`) with onboarding: enter subdomain or work-email → discovery endpoint resolves base URL → store per-tenant in Keychain. All `/api/v1` calls unchanged (server resolves tenant by Host). Tenant-zero keeps `jqc.ltservicesinc.com` as a custom domain so existing builds keep working through rollout. --- ## 8. Tenant-zero (LT Services) migration Register the **existing live LT database in place** — no dump/reload: 1. Insert `tenants` row (id 1), `db_*` pointing at the current LT DB + creds. Record its current alembic head. 2. Insert `tenant_domains`: primary subdomain `lts.jqc.app`; plus `jqc.ltservicesinc.com` (kind=custom, verified) so existing web users **and** existing iPad builds keep working with zero disruption. 3. Point wildcard DNS / Caddy at the (now tenant-aware) app. Resolver returns tenant 1 for both hosts. Result: existing users notice nothing; LT is now just "tenant 1" inside the new model. --- ## 9. Decisions resolved — MT-0 unblocked 1. **Quota-exceed** → soft warn (allow + flag upgrade). Never reject. §6. 2. **Tenant DB credentials** → per-tenant MySQL user + password; provisioning creates user/grants scoped to the single tenant DB; creds encrypted at rest. §3, MT-3. 3. **Tenant-zero** → register existing live LT DB in place, no data move. §8. All planning decisions locked. Ready to begin **MT-0** (control-plane scaffold) on request. ### MT-0 first deliverables (preview) - `jqc_control` database + control Alembic env (`control0001_init`). - Control models on a dedicated `ControlBase`: `Plan`, `PlanFeature`, `Tenant`, `TenantDomain`, `Superadmin`, `ProvisioningJob`, `TenantAudit`. - Plan seeder (Free / Starter / Pro / Enterprise per §6 matrix). - No data-plane change in MT-0 — existing app keeps running against the LT DB exactly as today.